EVE Search - Announcement:An Announcement Regarding Real Life Harassment

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Announcement:An Announcement Regarding Real Life Harassment

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 19 post(s)
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2108	Posted - 2014.03.28 13:34:00 - [1] - Quote If Ero is still allowed to play Eve, I just hope he has realized that it is possible to go too far, and that he modifies his behaviour and enjoys his time in the game. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2108	Posted - 2014.03.28 13:38:00 - [2] - Quote PinkPanter wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: PinkPanter wrote: So move along pretty much. Ok. Watch my accounts. Later. * not a rage quit. Just disagreement and something I do not want to affiliate myself with. Holla at ya. Don't forget to tell us how many accounts so I know how many new accounts to sub to compensate. Go cry more noob lol. And ** yeah I'll give my stuff away :) To all the nice people I know of course It would be better not to quit, go gank a few people to work off your anger instead. You will feel better for it. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2108	Posted - 2014.03.28 13:40:00 - [3] - Quote Cedric deBouilard wrote: so... did Erotica 1 got banned or not? I couldn't get anything from out of CCP corporate-speech That was the whole point What action CCP did or did not take is a private matter between CCP and Ero. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2113	Posted - 2014.03.28 17:04:00 - [4] - Quote Ramona McCandless wrote: My eroticals hurt No problem as CCP may well have permanently removed them for you. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2113	Posted - 2014.03.28 17:38:00 - [5] - Quote Lady Areola Fappington wrote: Man, I remember way back when, people would volunteer to sing to get out of a gank. "No ISK sing instead" was said in many local. Me, I demanded "Barbie Girl", that was my go-to for karaoke to save your ship. Now it's all with the cyberbully and the torture and the bonus rooms and the doublesuperharassment.... Someone bring me mah walker and a glass of iced tea, I'm goin to the farmer's market. Well I would be screwed if I met you ingame as I have never heard of the song, Barbie Girl This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2115	Posted - 2014.03.28 19:33:00 - [6] - Quote Mario Putzo wrote: I guess If I have a question for CCP. Where exactly is the line? In the sand. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2115	Posted - 2014.03.28 19:42:00 - [7] - Quote Xuixien wrote: CCP is very skilled at typing a lot of words to say nothing at all. As are many, many posters in the forums. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2121	Posted - 2014.03.28 19:56:00 - [8] - Quote What should be a matter of serious concern to us all, is that the forums are far more entertaining than the actual game play. Mining Veldsar just cannot compare to the forums for excitement and attempts personality ganking. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2121	Posted - 2014.03.28 20:03:00 - [9] - Quote Anne Dieu-le-veut wrote: Minerbumping.com is saying E1 has been permabanned. Maybe he could sing some songs and do a bit of reading to win back the right to play in the Bonus Room? Assuming he has indeed been perma-banned. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2126	Posted - 2014.03.28 20:35:00 - [10] - Quote Prince Kobol wrote: Kaius Fero wrote: Malcanis wrote: [. Refresh us.. why the community should vote fore you? Except being a goon pet,,, I mean.. if I need a scam king, I vote for any goon... In all of this I have been beyond impressed with how Malc has dealt with this. I do not know if he was designated by the CSM to post here and on the other thread, I do not know if he volunteered or if he was posting as a CSM rep or just a everyday player, either way I am glad I voted for him and it is a crying shame he is not re-running for the next CSM. Just want to say thanks for the work you did on one this Malc, you actually have done what I though was impossible given me faith in the CSM again. Seconded, and I have not previously been an admirer of Malcanis. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2130	Posted - 2014.03.28 20:53:00 - [11] - Quote To those of you who are concerned about what CCP regards as going too far, the solution is simple, if you think you are crossing the line, you probably are, and if you are still not sure, do something a bit 'iffy' and let CCP know. I am sure they will be glad to let you know if you are in compliance with the Eve Online CODE. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2135	Posted - 2014.03.29 06:57:00 - [12] - Quote MajorBean wrote: With that ban our loved sandbox lost alot of sand, Erotica 1 you will be remembered. Some will consider that a bit of poop has been removed from the sand. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2135	Posted - 2014.03.29 07:21:00 - [13] - Quote Mr Epeen wrote: baltec1 wrote: scumbags from high sec If there's one thing in this game that I can always count on, it's you managing to squeeze that into anything you post. Relevant or not. You are my rock, Baltec. Mr Epeen This made me smile This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2135	Posted - 2014.03.29 07:24:00 - [14] - Quote Riot Girl wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Some will consider that a bit of poop has been removed from the sand. Some are now viewing the CSM as the bit of poop in the sand. I would rather have the CSM than not, but I cannot say that I am a great fan of it. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2136	Posted - 2014.03.29 08:11:00 - [15] - Quote Mario Putzo wrote: Ban Ripard Teg! That is all. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2138	Posted - 2014.03.29 13:14:00 - [16] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Darkopus wrote: I don' thave time for sociopaths that attempt to hide behind the veil of a game when getting kicks out of publicly humiliating people for their own masturbatory pleasure. It would appear that CCP thinks the same which is why that deranged fool has been ejected from the game. And that is perfectly fine. But if CCP are going to use their digression to decide if we are sociopath scum or not, it would be nice to know where they draw that line, since it's clear from these threads that the communities definition is incredibly broad. I don't want to see a situation when a player is banned for something that another player is fine to do, and I don't want to see one victim ignored where and identical victim is helped. Perhaps you would be kind enough to provide CCP with a set of guidelines - rules which will cover all possible circumstances. I look forward to you being unable to provide one This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2138	Posted - 2014.03.29 15:53:00 - [17] - Quote I blame the whole Erotica 1 saga on hi-sec. I hope I do not get banned for impersonating Baltec 1 I should not smile at my own posts, that is just crazy! This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2139	Posted - 2014.03.29 16:26:00 - [18] - Quote TheGunslinger42 wrote: What I find most vile in all of this is Ripard Tegs underhanded approach to it all. If you don't like Erotica1 and what she did, fair enough. But to abuse his privileged position to push for an individual user to be banned, and then to write a highly inflammatory piece - one which resorts to hysterics and evocations of literal torture - and spreading it around news media when CCP didn't agree with him... that's just revolting on so many levels. ban ripard teg There is only on thing worse than someone doing something wrong, and that is someone else exposing the dirty deed to a wider public. Hmm, think again gun person. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2141	Posted - 2014.03.29 18:30:00 - [19] - Quote Vara Vampira wrote: So what I am getting from this...If i know an EVE Player outside of game. And we meet somewhere and I start making fun of him and "harassing" him for being a carebear and horrible at something, this would provoke CCP to ban me? It is unlikely, try it and see This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2145	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:57:00 - [20] - Quote Dorn Val wrote: Goa Chai wrote: Dorn Val wrote: Life is filled with all kinds of people, some bad and some good. So do you stay in your house all day afraid to go outside? Eve is more simulation than game and a reflection of what would happen if you put people in the environment that pod pilots are in. Think "Lord of the Flys". So.... who wants to be PIggy? Piggy saw the world not as it was but how he wanted it to be, so I'd guess that most of the high sec Care Bears could play the part... Baltec 1, is that you? This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2146	Posted - 2014.03.30 19:51:00 - [21] - Quote Folks it it time to do this...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOT7OwcbK-k This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2148	Posted - 2014.03.31 18:38:00 - [22] - Quote This from a similar thread. If CCP whacked Ero for what is commonly termed, 'gross misconduct' then it would mean that his behaviour was considered to be so beyond the pale that he forfeited the right to a warning. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2149	Posted - 2014.04.01 09:18:00 - [23] - Quote JC Anderson wrote: Surprised people haven't started flying in circles around and shooting the Jita monument yet. Perhaps that is because the two or three people who feel that CCP acted unfairly with regard to Ero, are too busy filling the forums with tears to actually shoot the Jita monument This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2150	Posted - 2014.04.01 11:09:00 - [24] - Quote I would suggest that when it comes to what, if any punishment CCP did or should meet out to Sohkar, one needs to be mindful of the order of events with the unfortunate event. Ero and crew provoked Sohkar to such an extent that CCP (apparently) ganked Ero for such actions. That Sohkar reacted badly and used, well, not very nice expressions and name calling was a result of being so badly goaded by Ero that CCP have cancelled their business relationship with him. Of course, Sohkar, with hindsight wishes he had not reacted so badly, but, it is worth stressing this, he reacted. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2170	Posted - 2014.04.04 07:02:00 - [25] - Quote Mario Putzo wrote: You folks need to get of the Erotica1 ****. Whats done is done. The issue is what precedent CCP has established. Which is cave to mob mentality. I am not sure it qualifies as a precedent, but CCP have made it clear that they find some behaviour unacceptable. For those who keep saying that they want clarification about what is and what is not considered to be acceptable in-game, the action taken by CCP should be a great help to them. It would be impossible for CCP to come up with a comprehensive, all defining set of rules to which players must adhere at all times, those who keep asking for this are simply trolling and they know it. Each of us (the relatively few) who have any opinion on the matter will apply their own personal values to what happened and opine on the forums accordingly. For me, Ero crossed the line with the 'speech impediment' part. To give Ero any isk, is foolish, to go into the bonus room is seriously foolish, but given how many players brag about how stupid other players are and how they take advantage of them, the mark was not alone in his stupidity. If I owned CCP I would have given Ero a three month ban, and made it very clear to him that any similar behaviour by him in the future would mean that we would just have to manage without him playing our game, forever. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2172	Posted - 2014.04.04 09:56:00 - [26] - Quote With regard to the Ero 'saga' I read on, I think it was Eurogamer, 'nerd world stuff' This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2183	Posted - 2014.04.10 17:26:00 - [27] - Quote Ever decreasing circles... This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2183	Posted - 2014.04.11 13:16:00 - [28] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Chopper Rollins wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: ..And the extent to which they'll enforce their EULA is very important, as once it covers twitter, blogs and the like, it's directly affecting our rights to freedom of speech.. No. Good job buddy. Lucas, you have the right to say anything you wish to, but it may have consequences. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2183	Posted - 2014.04.11 13:55:00 - [29] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Chopper Rollins wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: ..And the extent to which they'll enforce their EULA is very important, as once it covers twitter, blogs and the like, it's directly affecting our rights to freedom of speech.. No. Good job buddy. Lucas, you have the right to say anything you wish to, but it may have consequences. Aware of that, thanks. How long is the arm of CCPs law now that they no longer confine themselves to their own servers? Would be nice if CCP would answer simple queries like that. The way it seems to be now, it's like sitting in Nandos enjoying my meal, when a guy comes running in yelling that I'm banned from the cinema since I'm eating food I didn't buy from the cinema. It'd be nice to know how far away from EVE I need to be to be able to express myself without getting retroactively punished when someone has a sad. Perhaps you would be better off playing another game entirely, (you have been harping on and on with the same thing for pages and pages in this thread now) I doubt if anything you do should you quit Eve Online will cause CCP much concern then, and you will have all the freedom of speech you want. Oh, can I have your stuff? But not your one note whinge bag This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2183	Posted - 2014.04.11 13:59:00 - [30] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Chopper Rollins wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: ..And the extent to which they'll enforce their EULA is very important, as once it covers twitter, blogs and the like, it's directly affecting our rights to freedom of speech.. No. Good job buddy. Lucas, you have the right to say anything you wish to, but it may have consequences. Aware of that, thanks. How long is the arm of CCPs law now that they no longer confine themselves to their own servers? Would be nice if CCP would answer simple queries like that. The way it seems to be now, it's like sitting in Nandos enjoying my meal, when a guy comes running in yelling that I'm banned from the cinema since I'm eating food I didn't buy from the cinema. It'd be nice to know how far away from EVE I need to be to be able to express myself without getting retroactively punished when someone has a sad. Perhaps you would be better off playing another game entirely, (you have been harping on and on with the same thing for pages and pages in this thread now) I doubt if anything you do should you quit Eve Online will cause CCP much concern then, and you will have all the freedom of speech you want. Oh, can I have your stuff? But not your one note whinge bag This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2188	Posted - 2014.04.11 17:40:00 - [31] - Quote Dear Lucas, never been scammed, never scammed anyone else. I am not sorry that Ero is no more, but I have not suggested at any time that he should be perma- banned. You are asking CCP to state more clearly what they will tolerate and what is beyond the pale in the game so that you can be a barrack room lawyer and find fault with whatever they come up with. You should HTFU and get on with the game or be man enough to quit. Realistically, you will just keep crying in here until CCP forum ban you and then you can cry about how your right to free speech in a game owned by CCP is curtailing your right to cry in the forums. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2193	Posted - 2014.04.12 06:36:00 - [32] - Quote Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Anya Klibor wrote: Honestly, if CCP banned me for calling Danalee that word today, I'd have no problems with it. I unsubbed one of my accounts months ago, and the past month I haven't had much time to devote to the game outside of beta for Elder Scrolls Online, ...And I feel it's approriate to tell him to "go back to WoW" looks like you already are Snupe Doggur wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: ...asking CCP to state more clearly what they will tolerate and what is beyond the pale in the game so that you can be a barrack room lawyer and find fault with whatever they come up with. +1 Thread tl;dr right there. Harass outside of CCP's servers if that's what floats your boat, but if you choose to associate the harassment with CCP's trademarks and are dumb enough to leave evidence behind, those choice may have consequences inside CCP's servers. If you see a danger to your harassment hobby, get better at it--or at least more discreet about it--before you're told to leave. Even if noone puts in a ticket Just whips up the lynch mob. Sounds fair right? CCP taking steps to remove a player they considered had gone too far, as a punishment for his behaviour and to protect the good name of their product, is not a 'lynch mob' Of course if you believe that is was only the blog by Ripard which caused CCP to act, or are simply trolling by repeatedly saying this, then I shall leave you in your strange, paranoid state of mind. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2196	Posted - 2014.04.12 17:07:00 - [33] - Quote Dear Antisocial, I have never stated or claimed that there was a ticket. CCP acted of their own accord with input from many of the CSM. Deal with it and move on. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2199	Posted - 2014.04.12 17:56:00 - [34] - Quote Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Dear Antisocial, I have never stated or claimed that there was a ticket. CCP acted of their own accord with input from one of the CSM and caved due to pressure Deal with it and move on. fixt that for you Antisocial = Troll, no more no less. This is not a signature.

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,08s, ref 20250918/0629
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.